HAZOP stands for Hazard and Operability Study. It is used across a number of sectors to identify potential hazards. HAZOP is a very thorough process and so this guide will explain in more detail what HAZOP is, and how relevant industries can complete a HAZOP study.
In this guide:
HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) is a structured and systematic approach used to identify potential hazards and operational issues within a system, process, or facility. HAZOP is known by the terms HAZOP study or HAZOP analysis, but each refers to the same system and process. HAZOP studies are primarily utilised by industries that involve complex processes and hazardous materials, such as chemical manufacturing, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, and nuclear power, where safety and operational risks must be thoroughly understood and controlled.
A HAZOP study involves a multidisciplinary team that reviews the design and operations of a system. They examine any deviations from the intended design in order to pinpoint risks, assess their potential impacts, and recommend necessary measures to mitigate problems. HAZOP is an essential tool for enhancing safety, reliability, and efficiency in complex systems, helping to prevent accidents and ensure regulatory compliance.
The main goal of HAZOP is to examine how deviations from normal operations can lead to safety risks or operational problems. The primary purpose is to:
HAZOP and risk assessments are both essential tools used to identify and mitigate risks in various industries. There is also a third method called HAZID that you may have heard of. Each differs in their primary focus and the methods used.
HAZOP is a systematic, structured approach primarily aimed at identifying potential hazards and operational issues in a process or system through team discussions and brainstorming sessions. It examines deviations from the intent of existing processes or designs and how these deviations could lead to hazards, systematically analysing each part of the process in detail.
Risk assessments encompass a broader evaluation that identifies hazards but also estimates the likelihood and severity of potential incidents. This allows risks to be prioritised and managed in order to reduce them. While HAZOP delves deeply into the specifics of individual processes and their operational integrity, risk assessments provide more of an overview of risks across a range of activities, so that organisations can develop an overall risk management strategy.
HAZID is a preliminary method aimed at identifying potential hazards in a system early in the design process. It helps in recognising what could go wrong before detailed designs are created. HAZID is an initial screening tool, while HAZOP is a deep dive into operational aspects when designs are more established. Both methodologies work together, so although there are some differences in HAZID vs HAZOP, both are needed to ensure optimum safety across working systems.
The primary benefits of a HAZOP analysis are:
There are also some limitations with a HAZOP study, including:
A HAZOP analysis is done in four main phases. These are:
Before starting the HAZOP, it’s essential to define the system or process under review and set the objectives for the study. This is the preparation phase and could involve a specific unit, piece of equipment, or the entire facility, depending on the scope. Those carrying out the HAZOP will gather necessary documentation, such as process flow diagrams, manuals, and data sheets. The team is also assembled during this initial phase and roles are assigned to each team member.
This is when the actual HAZOP analysis is conducted. The team systematically reviews each part of the process using guide words, such as ‘more’, ‘less’, ‘as well as’, and ‘none’. They will discuss potential hazards and operability issues that could occur, allowing the team to identify deviations from normal operating conditions and assess any potential consequences.
In the evaluation phase, the hazards and operability issues that were defined during the identification phase are assessed in terms of their severity, likelihood, and risk. The team will talk about the implications of each deviation and rank them based on certain criteria, such as the potential impacts on safety, health, environment, and production. For particularly high-risk deviations, mitigation strategies are also proposed.
Finally, all findings from the HAZOP analysis must be documented, including any recommendations for corrective actions and improvements. A follow-up plan should be put in place to ensure that the recommended actions are implemented and reviewed. This documentation can be referred back to for future analyses and audits to improve safety and operations.
Although there are four main phases of a HAZOP study, in order to complete it effectively, there are a number of key steps to follow. These are:
You should begin by determining the boundaries of the HAZOP study, which involves identifying the system, process or equipment that will be analysed, and outlining its operational parameters and intended outcomes.
It’s important to gather a team of experts from various disciplines; most often from engineering, safety, operations, maintenance, and, if necessary, environmental management. Having a range of expertise will provide a more comprehensive analysis.
Collate all existing documentation related to the system and review the information. This typically includes:
Define the parameters that are to be examined during the HAZOP study. Common parameters are:
The process or system is divided into smaller, manageable sections called nodes. A node might represent a pipeline, a vessel, a pump, or any other part of the process. This breakdown ensures that every aspect of the system is studied thoroughly.
A set of guide words is used to help the team systematically identify possible deviations from normal operations. These are applied to each node to assess how deviations could occur. Common guide words include:
The team will need to meet to discuss each parameter using the guide words. They will talk about potential deviations, their causes and their consequences, and document all findings using detailed notes.
Analyse the potential consequences of each identified deviation, considering their severity and any possible impacts on safety, environment, and operations.
Review current safety measures and controls that have been implemented to mitigate identified risks for each node. The HAZOP team should assess the effectiveness of the measures and determine if additional controls are necessary.
Using the findings from the HAZOP analysis, compile recommendations to address any risks that have been identified and to enhance safety. Examples of these recommendations include:
The HAZOP analysis should be written up in a comprehensive report. This report should detail the methodology, findings, recommendations, and action items that have arisen from the HAZOP. The report should then be communicated to all relevant parties.
Establish a plan for implementing any recommended actions, and assign responsibilities to ensure these actions are completed. The HAZOP study needs to be reviewed often to accommodate any operational changes, new equipment, regulatory updates, or lessons learned from incidents that have occurred. Update the HAZOP as necessary to maintain safety standards.
HAZOPs are typically conducted at several key stages in the lifecycle of a facility or process:
At Rhino Safety, we are experts across all areas of health and safety, offering a range of services for every sector. To find out how we can support your business with health and safety for total compliance and a safe working environment, contact us now.